You've told me these persons are relatives that:
1. have sincere belief in their conspiracy theories
2. and likely getting deeper into it all, via online resources, connections with others, and finding validations likely from conservative media, and possibly others in conservative conspiracy oriented Idaho. They may also be getting some validation just from the "environment", where this Red State is full of survivalist oriented stores and info.
I would put in that group the abundance of ammo and gun outlets, but have put my own disclaimer on that, and put that disclaimer on other blogs on violence, human piracy, political psychopaths, and more. My disclaimer is this: I'm not against guns, ammo, those that hunt, those that collect, those that make their own ammo, those that shop at Cabelas or Sportsman's Warehouse, those that go to Gun and Ammo Shows (or like a friend of mine, sell ammo at those shows, and harvest (hunts) his annual elk).
It's just that in Nampa, you'll find an overflow of this. And, in Nampa at this time, it's not the abundance of weaponry, it's the sudden return to and surge of Survivalist stores. I'm also not against survivalist stores, or those starting or practicing that.
The problem then, is an unseen one: when is a person self motivated in their interests in these areas, versus those that are motivated by radical groups, radical websites, and conspiracy theories. And, are these conspiracy theories being influenced by:
A. the anti-social personality disorder listed in our "statement of purpose"
- online sites
- online chats
- groups with intent of recruiting and radicalizing
- groups that have known patterns of recruiting or radicalizing
B. the psychopathic politicians and greedy that soft well conspiracy theories for their own gains
C. the growing, growing memberships of these groups, of both the naive follower types and the Dark Disordered that will eventually rise into category A and B.
So what is the problem then? What is the difference between two persons that go to the Gun and Ammo Show at the Ford Idaho Center twice a year?
How can you tell the proverbial sheep from the goats, and separate them?
Is there a valid ammo user, or a valid planned survivalist versus one that is motivated by Qanon or other conspiracy theories?
Is there a detectable emotional element like fear, manic drive, or the characteristics of those in a cult that can be found out in a person (cult: following main leaders, antisocial doctrine, we're exclusive and special, we're superior, over commitment of time and money, loss of other human rights or freedoms to serve the group's need: sacrifice as heroic, distorted history of past or present news, frequently a religious under current, separation from others / family / friends in all or some ways, usually some form of elitism or racism).
- What questions do we have?
- What questions do you ask?
- What questions do you ask a conspiracy theorist? Note: I do lots of that now....
- What persons in the conspiracy are worthy of respectful "dealings", and what persons are so far into it all that they won't here you inquiry and respect?
- What questioning shows you're willing to not be rigid like the conspiracy theorists, and even to not be an asshole?
- What bridges with others are worth your time to work on, while others are worth your time in burning?
- Do we deal directly with the theorists or indirectly?
Tip: I've found in 40 years of clinical work, that one way to deal with those deeply entrenched and rigid is to use these methods:
1. be sincere, be interested, be human, and usually be willing to talk again. I DO share my full name and shake their hand, "Nice to know you".
2. share incongruencies, but in limited situations. Incongruencies are like "You believe the Covid Virus is a government conspiracy and one should doubt it and not use safety practices, but 200 persons died from it last week in (town). This may work, along with just sharing your own ideas or feelings / reactions about 20% of the time. That's not too good. By working, I mean they simply heard what you said, and understand what you said.
3. The best method is to share the generic biggy Question: Are you sure ........
Now, that biggy is just a question of doubt. It does something in the mind, and unfortunately, doesn't have a noticeable response or result on the day you're talking to the person. But, it does put the question in the mind, and it does impact that person........
That is the exclusive helpful method. Other methods above show your humanity to the other.
If you'd like more on that method, please comment below, and also share your own experience. If requested, there could be several other articles on #3, because there are some methods, and the person you're talking to will become resistant if you use it in a lame or oft repeated manner.
Again, help this blog and others by leaving your comment below: a real Google account is required to verify a true identity.
An initial statement of the purpose of this Blog:
No comments:
Post a Comment